9:00 9.15
|
Introduction
|
|
9:15 10:30
|
Position papers
|
(download all papers, pdf 1 MB)
|
|
Florian Michahelles and Bernt Schiele, ETH Zurich
|
Experiencing Technology before it exists: A Case Study (paper, slides)
|
|
Laurent Ciarletta, LORIA
|
Emulating the Future with/of Pervasive Computing Research and Development (paper, slides)
|
|
Scott Davidoff et al., CMU
|
Can Early-Stage Tools and Techniques for Iterative Design Help Researchers Understand a Problem Space? (paper, slides)
|
|
Cormac Driver et al., Trinity College Dublin
|
A Framework for Mobile, Context-aware Trails-based Applications: Experiences with an Application-led Approach (paper, slides)
|
|
Andrew Kun et al., University of New Hampshire
|
Design and Evaluation of a Ubiquitous Computing Application for Law Enforcement (paper, video)
|
11:00 12:30
|
Position papers
|
|
|
Philip Robinson, University of Karlsruhe
|
An Application-led Approach for Security Research in Ubicomp (paper, slides)
|
|
Nigel Davies, Lancaster University
|
Proof-of-Concept Demonstrators and Other Evils of Application-Led Research (paper, slides)
|
|
Richard Beckwith, Intel Research
|
What is to be done? (paper, slides)
|
|
Anil Madhavapeddy and Nick Ludlam, Cambridge U.
|
Ubiquitious Computing needs to catch up with Ubiquitous Media (paper, slides)
|
|
Joshua Lifton and Mathew Laibowitz, MIT Media Lab.
|
Application-led Research in Ubiquitous Computing: A Wireless Sensor Network Perspective (paper, slides)
|
|
Richard Sharp, Intel Research
|
Deploy or Die: A Choice for Application-Led Ubiquitous Computing Research (paper, slides)
|
14:30 15:50
|
Panel Session
|
|
|
Panelists: 10 mins each + 5 mins for questions/comments
Gregory Abowd Georgia Tech (summary notes)
Gaetano Borriello University of Washington (slides)
William Newman independent consultant (slides)
Abi Sellen Microsoft Research (slides)
Roy Want Intel Research (slides)
|
16:05 17:15
|
Collective discussion on: (Discussion summary slides)
How to write a good application-led ubicomp paper.
How can we make our work build more effectively on previous work?
What are we doing wrong / what right?
|